Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Joseph Calvin Crawford, A/K/A J. C. Crawford, No. 30632 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
446 F.2d 1085
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1971-08-10
- Topic
- estate-planning
446 F.2d 1085 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Calvin CRAWFORD, a/k/a J. C. Crawford, Defendant-Appellant. No. 30632 Summary Calendar.* *(1) Rule 18, 5th Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Joseph Calvin Crawford, A/K/A J. C. Crawford, No. 30632 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5th Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph Calvin CRAWFORD, a/k/a J. C. Crawford, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 30632 Summary Calendar.*
*(1) Rule 18, 5th Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431
F.2d 409, Part I.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 10, 1971.
PER CURIAM:
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by John F. Tomlin, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also Minor v. United States, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521.
John F. Tomlin, Pecos, Tex. (Ct. Appt.) for defendant-appellant.
Seagal V. Wheatley, U.S. Atty., Haskell Shelton, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ralph E. Harris, Asst. U.S. Atty., EL Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.