Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

CROSS v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN MATEO CTY., 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971)

Nancy Jewell CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bd. OF SUPERVISORS, SANMATEO COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-04-23
Topic
general

CROSS v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN MATEO CTY., 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971) Nancy Jewell CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SANMATEO COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 24137.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 23, 1971.Rehearing Denied June 11, 1971.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CROSS v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN MATEO CTY., 442 F.2d 362 (9th Cir. 1971). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CROSS v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN MATEO CTY.,442 F.2d 362(9th Cir. 1971)
Nancy Jewell CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SAN
MATEO COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 24137.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 23, 1971.
Rehearing Denied June 11, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Oliver J. Carter, Judge.
Nancy Jewell Cross, in pro. per.

Cooper, White Cooper, Richard J. Archer, James J. Garrett, of Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton Clark, O'Connor, Cohn Lynch, Cyril Viadro, San Francisco, Cal., Norman S. Menifee, Redwood City, Cal., for appellees.
Before MADDENfn*, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities cited by appellant, we are satisfied that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinion. See326 F. Supp. 634(N.D.Calif. 1968).

The judgment is affirmed.Page 407
  1. Honorable J. Warren Madden, Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation. ↩