Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

441 F.2d 728

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-04-19
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1 . See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
MUNGIN v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY,441 F.2d 728(5th Cir. 1971)
Nehemiah MUNGIN et al., Plaintiffs Appellees, Walter J. Howard et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, Inc.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 29878.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District ofPage 729Florida, CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge,318 F. Supp. 720.
Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Erle Phillips, Fisher Phillips, William W. Alexander, Jr., Atlanta, Ga. Milledge Horn, Richard L. Horn, Allan Milledge, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before WISDOM, BELL and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
  1. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970,430 F.2d 966. ↩