Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Charles A. Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, No. 30849 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Charles A. Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Dir., Div. of Corr., State of Fla., No. 30849 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enters., Inc v. Citizens Cas. Co. Of N.Y., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 439 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1971-02-16
- Topic
- bankruptcy
439 F.2d 264 Charles A. PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee. No. 30849 Summary Calendar.* *Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Charles A. Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, No. 30849 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Charles A. PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections,
State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 30849 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 16, 1971.
Charles A. Porter, pro se.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court denying the petition of a Florida state prisoner for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
In this habeas corpus case the United States District Court denied relief on the ground that Porter had failed to exhaust state remedies. A study of the record reveals that this, indeed, is true. Porter's allegations with reference to the denial of a direct appeal have never been considered by a state appellate court, see 28 U.S.C. 2254; Wheeler v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1969,407 F.2d 816; Harrison v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1970, 424 F.2d 633.
Affirmed.