Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Michael Alan McCarroll v. Lonnie Morrow and Ernest L. Holman, Dallas County Sheriff's Deputies

Michael Alan McCarroll v. Lonnie Morrow & Ernest L. Holman, Dall. County Sheriff's Deputies, 435 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1971)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-01-12
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from District Court denial of a civil rights petition seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. 1 Appellant, McCarroll, asserts that he has been subjected to cruel and inhuman treatment by certain prison officials in the Dallas County Jail. An uncontested affidavit has been filed in this Court certifying that the appellant is no longer an inmate of the Dallas County Jail. This appeal, therefore, is dismissed as moot. Appeal dismissed. 1 . It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Michael Alan McCarroll v. Lonnie Morrow and Ernest L. Holman, Dallas County Sheriff's Deputies. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
McCARROLL v. MORROW,435 F.2d 560(5th Cir. 1971)
Michael Alan McCARROLL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lonnie MORROW and Ernest
L. Holman, Dallas County Sheriff's Deputies, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 30362.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 12, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Sarah Tilghman Hughes, Judge.
Michael A. McCarroll, pro se.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., John B. Tolle, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for appellees.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from District Court denial of a civil rights petition seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.1Appellant, McCarroll, asserts that he has been subjected to cruel and inhuman treatment by certain prison officials in the Dallas County Jail. An uncontested affidavit has been filed in this Court certifying that the appellant is no longer an inmate of the Dallas County Jail. This appeal, therefore, is dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.Page 665
  1. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir., 1969,412 F.2d 981. ↩