Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Corning Glass Works v. Jeannette Glass Co.
Corning Glass Works v. Jeannette Glass Co., 432 F.2d 784 (2d Cir. 1970)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1970-10-29
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM: We affirm on the opinion of Judge Edelstein below, Corning Glass Works v. Jeannette Glass Company, 308 F.Supp. 1321 (S.D.N.Y.1970).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Corning Glass Works v. Jeannette Glass Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
CORNING GLASS WORKS v. JEANNETTE GLASS COMPANY,432 F.2d 784(2nd Cir. 1970)
CORNING GLASS WORKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The JEANNETTE GLASS COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 129, Docket 34704.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued October 20, 1970.
Decided October 29, 1970.
Sheldon Berns, Cleveland, Ohio (Bernard J. Stuplinski, Kahn, Kleinman, Yanowitz Arnson, Cleveland, Ohio, Alvin M. Stein, Parker, Chapin Flattau, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
The Jeannette Glass Company appeals from an order entered on February 9, 1970 which enjoined it from using in connection with the manufacture, sale, offering for sale or advertisement of ovenware and other goods or services the term Lady Cornellia or the blue flower design shown on Lady Cornellia oven-ware, or any other term, name, mark or design that includes or so nearly resembles plaintiff's Corning, Corning Ware or blue cornflower design trademarks as is likely to cause confusion or mistake or the deception of purchasers or consumers. This preliminary injunction was issued on the motion of Corning Glass Works, which complained of alleged trademark infringement and unfair competition by the appellant and others who did not appeal.
Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.