Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Stanford Frank, Witness

In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Stanford Frank, Witness, 427 F.2d 714 (3d Cir. 1970)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1970-06-19
Topic: general

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. In the light of Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L.Ed. 783 (1940), we find the order appealed from not to be a final decision under Section 1291, 28 U.S.C. Accordingly, the motion for supersedeas will be denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Stanford Frank, Witness. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION,427 F.2d 714(3rd Cir. 1970)

In re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. Appeal of Stanford FRANK, Witness.

No. 19022.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued June 19, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Victor Wright, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien Frankel, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

David E. Abrahamsen, Department of Justice, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, STALEY and ADAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In the light of Cobbledick v. United States,309 U.S. 323, 60 S.Ct. 540, 84 L. Ed. 783 (1940), we find the order appealed from not to be a final decision under Section 1291, 28 U.S.C. Accordingly, the motion for supersedeas will be denied.