Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Fred H. Carter v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

Fred H. Carter v. Robert H. Finch, Sec’y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 421 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1970)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1970-01-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The Social Security benefit claim now pressed was presented to us previously in Carter v. Celebrezze, 367 F.2d 382 (4 Cir., 1966). The District Court’s denial of Fred H. Carter’s suit was vacated and remanded for reconsideration because of subsequent amendments to Sections 216 (i) and 223 of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 416(i) (1) (A) and 423(c) (2) (A) (Supp.1965). On its return to him the District Judge adjudicated the cause under these changes in the law.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fred H. Carter v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
CARTER v. FINCH,421 F.2d 702(4th Cir. 1970)
Fred H. CARTER, Appellant, v. Robert H. FINCH, Secretary of Health,
Education and Welfare, Appellee.
No. 13473.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
January 29, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley; John A. Field, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Franklin W. Kern, Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.

Charles M. Love, III, Charleston, W. Va. (Wade H. Ballard, III, U.S. Atty. and W. Warren Upton, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Social Security benefit claim now pressed was presented to us previously in Carter v. Celebrezze,367 F.2d 382(4 Cir., 1966). The District Court's denial of Fred H. Carter's suit was vacated and remanded for reconsideration because of subsequent amendments to Sections 216(i) and 223 of the Social Security Act.42 U.S.C.A. §§ 416(i)(1)(A) and423(c)(2)(A) (Supp. 1965). On its return to him the District Judge adjudicated the cause under these changes in the law. He again sustained the Secretary's refusal of benefits to Carter as having substantial support in the evidence. Carter v. Finch,308 F. Supp. 954(SDW.Va. 1969).

On reexamination of the record we cannot say the District Judge was in error, and on his opinion we affirm.

Affirmed.Page 841