Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Augustus v. Board of Public Instructions of Escambia County
420 F.2d 778
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1969-12-29
- Topic
- bankruptcy
PER CURIAM: After having given consideration to the appendix and the briefs filed in said *779cause by the parties, this court is of the opinion that the district court did not commit error in refusing to allow intervention in this cause by the Intervenors-Appellants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is Affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Augustus v. Board of Public Instructions of Escambia County. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Karen Renee AUGUSTUS, a minor, by Charles A. Augustus, her
father and next friend, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY,
FLORIDA, etc., et al., Defendants, v. Nancy Jeanne BADREE, a
minor, by Charles A. Badree, her father and next friend, et
al., Intervenors-Appellants.
No. 28111.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 29, 1969.
S. Gunter Toney, Toney & Guarisco, Tallahassee, Fla., for intervenors-appellants.
Theodore R. Bowers, Panama City, Fla., William L. Robinson, Jack Greenberg, Norman J. Chachkin, James M. Nabrit, III, Drew S. Days, III, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.
J. Edwin Holsberry, Pensacola, Fla., for other interested parties.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After having given consideration to the appendix and the briefs filed in said cause by the parties, this court is of the opinion that the district court did not commit error in refusing to allow intervention in this cause by the Intervenors-Appellants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.