Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. A. T. Garrett, W. D. Walters, and J. B. McDaniel

418 F.2d 1250

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-12-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: On January 10, 1969, the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia imposed upon the appellants a civil penalty of one hundred dollars each. 296 F.Supp. 1302. Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel we are of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. A. T. Garrett, W. D. Walters, and J. B. McDaniel. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. GARRETT,418 F.2d 1250(5th Cir. 1969)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A.T. GARRETT, W.D.
Walters, and J.B. McDaniel, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 27436.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
December 2, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia at Atlanta; Sidney O. Smith, Jr., Judge.
J.R. Goldthwaite, Jr., Adair, Goldthwaite, Stanford Daniel, Atlanta, Ga., Plato E. Papps, Louis P. Poulton, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Jonathan Howe, Atty., Legal Division Federal Aviation Agency, for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
On January 10, 1969, the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia imposed upon the appellants a civil penalty of one hundred dollars each.296 F. Supp. 1302.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel we are of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.
Affirmed.Page 1251
Page 1294