Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Rush PETTWAY and Peter J. Wrenn Et Al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Appellee

415 F.2d 1376

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-10-07
Topic
international-arbitration

PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Rush PETTWAY and Peter J. Wrenn Et Al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Appellee. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
PETTWAY v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY,415 F.2d 1376(5th Cir. 1969)
Rush PETTWAY and Peter J. Wrenn et al., Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON
PIPE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 25826.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 7, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Seybourn H. Lynne, Judge.
Oscar W. Adams, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., Leroy D. Clark, Robert Belton, New York City, for appellants.

J.R. Forman, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Daniel Steiner, Gen. Counsel, EEOC, Russell Specter, David R. Cashdan, Attys., EEOC, Washington, D.C., Equal Employment Opportunity Comm., amici curiae.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC OF411 F.2d 998.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, RIVES and McENTEEfn*, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule35Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.Page 1377
  1. Of the First Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩