Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

William Dantzler v. Defender Shipping Co., Inc., and Earl J. Smith & Co., Inc

411 F.2d 792

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-07-09
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Oh review of the record we find no error. The Judgment in favor of defendants, Defender Shipping Co., Inc. and Earl J. Smith & Co., Inc. and against the plaintiff, William Dantzler, entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict, will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed William Dantzler v. Defender Shipping Co., Inc., and Earl J. Smith & Co., Inc. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
DANTZLER v. DEFENDER SHIPPING CO., INC.,411 F.2d 792(3rd Cir. 1969)
William DANTZLER, Appellant, v. DEFENDER SHIPPING CO., Inc., and Earl J.
Smith Co., Inc.
No. 17335.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued June 2, 1969.
Decided June 17, 1969.
Rehearing Denied July 9, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Ralph C. Body, Judge,285 F. Supp. 541.
Edwin E. Naythons, Freedman, Borowsky Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

E. Alfred Smith, Krusen, Evans Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa. (Timothy J. Mahoney, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before KALODNER, VAN DUSEN and STAHL, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
On review of the record we find no error. The Judgment in favor of defendants, Defender Shipping Co., Inc. and Earl J. Smith Co., Inc. and against the plaintiff, William Dantzler, entered pursuant to the jury's verdict, will be affirmed.