Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Acme Boat Rentals, Inc. v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc. v. Freeport Sulphur Company, Third-Party

407 F.2d 1324

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-02-25
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of the Court, this case has been placed on the summary calendar for disposition without oral argument. 1 *1325 This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was rendered without a statement of either findings of fact or conclusions of law. Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states: “In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon * * Such findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory and must be sufficient in detail and exactness to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion reached by the court. S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acme Boat Rentals, Inc. v. J. Ray McDermott & Company, Inc. v. Freeport Sulphur Company, Third-Party. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
12 opinions
ACME BOAT RENTALS, INC. v. J. RAY McDERMOTT,407 F.2d 1324(5th Cir. 1969)
ACME BOAT RENTALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. RAY McDERMOTT
COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, v. FREEPORT SULPHUR COMPANY,
Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26835.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 25, 1969.
Edmond C. Salassi, New Orleans, La., of Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere Denegre, New Orleans, La., for J. Ray McDermott Co., Inc.

Charles E. Lugenbuhl, Bruce J. Borrello, New Orleans, La., Maurice C. Hebert, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Acme Boat Rentals, Inc., appellee; Lemle, Kelleher, Kohlmeyer, Matthews Schumacher, New Orleans, La., of counsel.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of the Court, this case has been placed on the summary calendar for disposition without oral argument.1Page 1325

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court sitting without a jury. The judgment was rendered without a statement of either findings of fact or conclusions of law. Rule52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon * * *." Such findings of fact and conclusions of law are mandatory and must be sufficient in detail and exactness to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion reached by the court. S.S. Silberblatt, Inc. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1965,353 F.2d 545; Mladinich v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967,371 F.2d 940.

The judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for findings of fact and conclusions of law not inconsistent with Rule 52(a) and the decisions of this court. Cf. Myles v. Quinn Menhaden Fisheries, Inc., 5 Cir., 1962,302 F.2d 146, on form of findings and conclusions.

Vacated and remanded.Page 1334
  1. In order to establish a docket control procedure, the Fifth Circuit adopted new Rules 17-20 on December 6, 1968. See Wittner v. United States, 5 Cir., 1969,406 F.2d 1165[slip opinion dated January 23, 1969], Fn. 1 and Appendix thereto. ↩