Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Guy Ellenburg v. A. L. Shepherd, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins
Guy Ellenburg v. A. L. Shepherd, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells & Marcus Higgins, 406 F.2d 1331 (6th Cir. 1969)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1969-02-24
- Topic
- general
ORDER The motion to dismiss the appeal as to defendants-appellees, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins, is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed as to them. On consideration of the appeal as to defendant-appellee, A. L. Shepherd, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Guy Ellenburg v. A. L. Shepherd, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
ELLENBURG v. SHEPHERD,406 F.2d 1331(6th Cir. 1968)
Guy ELLENBURG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.L. SHEPHERD, Kenneth R. Rollins,
Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 18240.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 25, 1968.
Certiorari Denied February 24, 1969.
See 89 S.Ct. 878.
N.R. Coleman, Jr., Greeneville, Tenn., Milligan, Silvers Coleman, Greeneville, Tenn., on brief, for appellees.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge. O'SULLIVAN and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges.
The motion to dismiss the appeal as to defendants-appellees, Kenneth R. Rollins, Bobby Gene Wells and Marcus Higgins, is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed as to them.
On consideration of the appeal as to defendant-appellee, A.L. Shepherd, the Court finds that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury and that no prejudicial error has intervened.
It is accordingly ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it is hereby affirmed.Page 67