Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fentress

United States v. Fentress, 405 F.2d 501 (4th Cir. 1969)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-02-06
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Upon careful consideration of the briefs and oral argument of counsel, we find no error in the conviction. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Fentress. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. FENTRESS,405 F.2d 501(4th Cir. 1969)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Leonard Simmons FENTRESS,
Appellant.
No. 12318.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued February 3, 1969.
Decided February 6, 1969.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Alexander Harvey, II, Judge.
Alfred S. Fried, Riverdale, Md., for appellant.

Paul R. Kramer, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Stephen H. Sachs, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon careful consideration of the briefs and oral argument of counsel, we find no error in the conviction.
Affirmed.Page 502
Page 596