Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

404 F.2d 938

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1969-01-14
Topic
litigation

404 F.2d 938 70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2384 BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES et al., Appellants, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Appellee. Nos. 293-297, Dockets 32862-32866. United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
B. OF RY., AIRLINE v. PAN AM. WORLD AIRWAYS,404 F.2d 938(2nd Cir. 1969)
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS,
EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES et al., Appellants, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD
AIRWAYS, INC., Appellee.
Nos. 293-297, Dockets 32862-32866.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued January 14, 1969.
Decided January 14, 1969.
The Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, et al. (BRAC) appeal from a final order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Bryan, J., declaring that it is a violation of the Railway Labor Act for Pan American World Airways, Inc. (Pan American), to conduct negotiations with the BRAC pursuant to the notice served under Section 6 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. § 156), to revise the outstanding collective bargaining agreement between BRAC and Pan American until final resolution by the National Mediation Board of a pending representation proceeding before that Board as to whether BRAC or International Brotherhood of Teamsters is the proper union to bargain for Pan American employees involved; which judgment and order also enjoined the BRAC, its officers and representatives from conducting a strike against Pan American for the purpose of compelling Pan American to engage in negotiations with BRAC.
David J. Fleming, New York City, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., Mulholland, Hickey Lyman, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Herbert Prashker, Eric Rosenfeld, Lawrence A. Katz, Poletti, Freidin, Prashker, Feldman Gartner, New York City, for appellee.
Before WATERMAN, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment appealed from is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Bryan, reported at275 F. Supp. 986(1967).