Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Cross v. Kaimana

401 F.2d 182

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1968-10-16
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM: The judgments in the above-entitled causes, consolidated for trial and appeal, are affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reported sub nom. Long Island Tankers Corporation et al. v. S. S. Kaimana et ah, 265 F.Supp. 723.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cross v. Kaimana. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
CROSS v. KAIMANA,401 F.2d 182(9th Cir. 1968)
John A. CROSS et al., Appellants, v. S.S. KAIMANA, her engines, etc., et
al., Appellees. John A. CROSS et al., Appellants, v. S.S. LANAKILA, her
engines, etc., et al., Appellees. John A. CROSS et al., Appellants, v.
S.S. ALASKA BEAR, her engines, etc., et al., Appellees. John A. CROSS et
al., Appellants, v. S.S. PACIFIC BEAR, her engines, etc., et al.,
Appellees. John A. CROSS et al., Appellants, v. S.S. COAST PROGRESS, her
engines, etc., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 21719, 21719-A to 21719-D.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 16, 1968.
Certiorari Denied February 24, 1969.
See 89 S.Ct. 879.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; William T. Sweigert, Judge.
Richard Ernst (argued), John Paul Jennings (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Richard G. Logan, Oakland, Cal., Marvin C. Taylor, Edgartown, Mass., for appellants.

John Hays (argued), of Dorr, Cooper Hays, Severson, Zang, Werson, Berke Larson, John F. Meadows, Chief, Adm. Shipping Sec., McCutchen, Doyle, Brown Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before POPE, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgments in the above-entitled causes, consolidated for trial and appeal, are affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court reportedsub nom. Long Island Tankers Corporation et al. v. S.S. Kaimana et al.,265 F. Supp. 723.