Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Nathaniel Buchanan v. The Honorable James A. Rhodes
400 F.2d 882
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1968-10-14
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. In this case appellants attack as federally unconstitutional the provisions of Ohio’s constitution and statutes which provide for the election and assignment of Ohio’s trial judges. The District Judge before whom this complaint was filed dismissed the complaint without convening a three-judge court. The factual background and legal issues are fully stated in his opinion. Buchanan v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nathaniel Buchanan v. The Honorable James A. Rhodes. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 9 opinions
BUCHANAN v. RHODES,400 F.2d 882(6th Cir. 1968)
Nathaniel BUCHANAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The Honorable James
A. RHODES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17557.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 3, 1968.
Certiorari Denied October 14, 1968.
See 89 S.Ct. 118.
James A. McLaughlin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, William B. Saxbe, Atty. Gen., Charles S. Lopeman, Chief Counsel, Columbus, Ohio, on brief, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
On consideration of the procedural aspects of this appeal only, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for the convening of a three-judge court under28 U.S.C. § 2281(1964).Page 992