Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States ex rel. Spinosa v. Curran

4 F.2d 614

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1924-10-20
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Order (4 F.[2d] 613) affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Spinosa v. Curran. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 4 opinions

UNITED STATES v. CURRAN,4 F.2d 614(2nd Cir. 1924)

UNITED STATES ex rel. Andreas SPINOSA, Relator Appellant, v. Henry H.

CURRAN, as Commissioner, etc., Respondent Appellee.

No. 21.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

October 20, 1924.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Anthony Romano, of New York City, for appellant.

Ralph C. Greene, U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y. (William A. De Groot, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order (4 F.[2d] 613) affirmed.Page 615