Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Hastorf Contracting Co. v. Ocean Transportation Corp.

Hastorf Contracting Co. v. Ocean Transp. Corp., 4 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1924)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1924-11-21
Topic: commercial

PER CURIAM. Decree affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hastorf Contracting Co. v. Ocean Transportation Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

HASTORF CONTRACTING CO. v. OCEAN TRANSP. CORP.,4 F.2d 584(2nd Cir. 1924)

HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee, v. OCEAN TRANSPORTATION

CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee, James C. Davis, as Director General of

Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee, William Spencer Son

Corporation, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 94.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 21, 1924.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Affirming decree4 F.2d 583.

Spitz Bromberger, of New York City (Edgar Bromberger, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Wm. Spencer Son.

Foley Martin, of New York City (William J. Martin and George V.A. McCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.

Hunt, Hill Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Ocean Transportation Corporation.

Macklin, Brown Van Wyck, of New York City, for James C. Davis.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.