Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Alexander McAllister

United States v. Alexander McAllister, 395 F.2d 852 (3d Cir. 1968)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1968-06-03
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

suggesting “substantial evidence” in the record indicated petitioner had been rehabilitated and deportation should be stayed, but nevertheless affirming the district court’s deportation order

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Alexander McAllister. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

UNITED STATES v. McALLISTER,395 F.2d 852(3rd Cir. 1968)

UNITED STATES of America v. Alexander McALLISTER, Appellant.

No. 16805.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued May 6, 1968.

Decided June 3, 1968.

Robert A. Wayne, Shanley Fisher, Newark, N.J., for appellant.

Elliot Scher, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J. (David M. Satz, Jr., U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HASTIE, Chief Judge and McLAUGHLIN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

We find no reversible error in the trial below. Therefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

At the same time we observe that there is substantial evidence in the record which indicates strongly that the appellant has been rehabilitated. He seems to be legitimately employed and to be supporting his wife, their several children and his widowed mother. Therefore, we think it would be appropriate for the Department to make further inquiry to the end that, if justified, appellant's deportation at least be stayed during his good behavior.