Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Cage v. New York Central Railroad

Cage v. N.Y. Cent. R.R., 386 F.2d 998 (3d Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-12-01
Topic
general

.......OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by the New York Central Railroad from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. By its order, the district court granted third-party defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and denied appellant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial. We have carefully examined the record and can find no error. The order of the district court will be affirmed on the basis of its well reasoned opinion, Cage v. New York Central R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cage v. New York Central Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
CAGE v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY,386 F.2d 998(3rd Cir. 1967)
Dale C. CAGE, Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage and Dale C.
Cage, Administrator of the Estate of Antoinette E. Cage, and Dale C. Cage,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation,
Defendant and Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dale C. CAGE,
Administrator of the Estate of Carolyn Sue Cage, Third-Party
Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 16560-16562.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued November 7, 1967.
Decided December 1, 1967.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Gerald J. Weber, Judge.
Irving Murphy, MacDonald, Illig, Jones Britton, Erie, Pa., for appellant.

Leonard E. Price, Price Bercik, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Louis M. Tarasi, Jr., Burgwin, Ruffin, Perry, Pohl Springer, Pittsburgh, Pa., James D. Loesch, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

John G. Gent, Erie, Pa., for appellee, third-party defendant (Curtze, Gent McCullough, Erie, Pa., on the brief).
Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal by the New York Central Railroad from an order of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. By its order, the district court granted third-party defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and denied appellant's motion for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial.

We have carefully examined the record and can find no error.

The order of the district court will be affirmed on the basis of its well reasoned opinion, Cage v. New York Central R.R.,276 F. Supp. 778(W.D.Pa., 1967).Page 999Page 62