Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States ex rel. Houghton v. Scranton

379 F.2d 556

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-07-26
Topic
general

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM. On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court of May 16, 1966 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Wood in his Memorandum Opinion. 272 F.Supp. 960 (E.D.Pa.1966).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Houghton v. Scranton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
UNITED STATES EX REL. HOUGHTON v. SCRANTON,379 F.2d 556(3rd Cir. 1967)
UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Joseph M. HOUGHTON, Appellant, v.
William W. SCRANTON, Gov., Hon. Walter Alessandroni, Arthur T. Prasse,
Com. State Corr., David N. Myers, Supt. State Corr. Institution,
Graterford, Penna. and Clarence R. Wolfe, Dept. Supt. et al.
No. 16208.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted June 19, 1967.
Decided July 26, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harold K. Wood, Judge.Page 557
Joseph M. Houghton, pro se.

Thomas J. Mangan, Jr., Legal Asst., Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court of May 16, 1966 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Wood in his Memorandum Opinion.272 F. Supp. 960(E.D.Pa. 1966).