Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Graney v. United States

Graney v. United States, 377 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-06-02
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We affirm on the findings and conclusions of the District Court and for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion.1 Affirmed. . Graney v. United States, 258 F.Supp. 383 (D.C.S.D.W.Va.1966).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Graney v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
GRANEY v. UNITED STATES,377 F.2d 992(4th Cir. 1967)
Patrick C. GRANEY and Thelma Graney, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of
America, Appellee.
No. 11157.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 31, 1967.
Decided June 2, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston; John A. Field, Jr., Chief District Judge.
John Glandon Davies and William H. Deck, Washington, D.C. (Patrick C. Graney, Jr., Fayetteville, W. Va., on brief), for appellants.

Stuart A. Smith, Attorney, Department of Justice (Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter and Robert H. Solomon, Attorneys, Department of Justice, and Milton J. Ferguson, U.S. Atty., and W. Warren Upton, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the findings and conclusions of the District Court and for the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion.1

Affirmed.Page 993
  1. Graney v. United States,258 F. Supp. 383(D.C.S.D.W.Va. 1966). ↩