Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
United States ex rel. Heacock v. Myers
367 F.2d 583
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1966-11-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the Circuit was “in complete accord” with the district court’s determination that “[n]o constitutional question is involved in the Parole Board’s failure to give relator credit for time on parole and its adjustment of the expiration date of his new maximum.”
- expressing “complete accord” and affirming opinion of district court in United States ex rel. Heacock v. Myers, 251 F. Supp. 773, 774 (E.D. Pa. 1966
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Heacock v. Myers. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
UNITED STATES v. MYERS,367 F.2d 583(3rd Cir. 1966)
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. William M. HEACOCK, Appellant, v. David
N. MYERS, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford,
Pennsylvania, and the Entire Pennsylvania Board of Parole.
No. 15885.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Submitted on Briefs October 21, 1966.
Decided November 2, 1966.
Michael J. Rotko, Alan J. Davis, Asst. Dist. Attys., Arlen Specter, Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT