Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.

361 F.2d 219

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-06-03
Topic: commercial

PER CURIAM. This suit was brought by appellants against their employer and union under 29 U.S.C. § 301 et seq. We have fully reviewed the record and affirm the judgment of the district court on the excellent opinion of Judge Rosenberg, 245 F.Supp. 864 (W.D.Pa., 1965). The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

SMITH v. PITTSBURGH GAGE AND SUPPLY COMPANY,361 F.2d 219(3rd Cir. 1966)

Karl R. SMITH, James Reed, Joseph Wachtre and Ed Owens, Appellants, v.

PITTSBURGH GAGE AND SUPPLY COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and

Steamfitters Local Union No. 449 of the United Association of Journeymen

and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United

States and Canada, an Unincorporated Association.

No. 15773.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued May 17, 1966.

Decided June 3, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Louis Rosenberg, Judge.

Donald E. Rohall, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

John G. Wayman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Leonard L. Scheinholtz and Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought by appellants against their employer and union under29 U.S.C. § 301et seq. We have fully reviewed the record and affirm the judgment of the district court on the excellent opinion of Judge Rosenberg,245 F. Supp. 864(W.D.Pa., 1965).

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.Page 220