Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston

361 F.2d 218

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-04-20
Topic: international-arbitration

PER CURIAM: We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint seeking to stay arbitration for the reasons stated in Judge McLean’s opinion below, 253 F.Supp. 509.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

A. SELTZER CO., INC. v. LIVINGSTON,361 F.2d 218(2nd Cir. 1966)

In the Matter of A. SELTZER CO., Inc., Crane-Gallo Artist Suppliers,

Inc., M.M. Michaels, Inc., Plaza Artist Materials, Inc., Irving Berlin,

Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David LIVINGSTON, as President of District

65, RWDSU, AFL-CIO, an unincorporated Association of more than seven

members, the "Union," Defendant-Appellee.

No. 409, Docket 30400.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Submitted April 14, 1966.

Decided April 20, 1966.

Appeal from judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Edward C. McLean, J., dismissing a complaint seeking to stay arbitration.

Herbert A. Lien, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Eugene G. Eisner, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs' complaint seeking to stay arbitration for the reasons stated in Judge McLean's opinion below,253 F. Supp. 509.