Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

In re Statler

In re Statler, 36 F.2d 1021 (2d Cir. 1930)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1930-01-06
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. Decree [31 F.(2d) 767] affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Statler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MATTER OF STATLER,36 F.2d 1021(2nd Cir. 1930)

In the Matter of the Petition of E.M. STATLER, as Owner of THE Vessel

MIRAMAR for Limitation of Liability.

No. 139.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 6, 1930.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Silas B. Axtell, of New York City (Elizabeth Robinson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating McGrann, of New York City (Charles R. Hickox, Vernon S. Jones, and Edwin S. Murphy, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees executors of estate of E.M. Statler.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree [31 F.2d 767] affirmed.Page 1022