Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Cunningham v. A. J. Aberman, Inc.

Cunningham v. A. J. Aberman, Inc., 358 F.2d 747 (3d Cir. 1966)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-03-15
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: On review of the record and consideration of the supplemental briefs filed by the parties, the Order of the District Court dated March 25, 1965 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Sorg in his Opinion, 252 F.Supp. 602, filed that date.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cunningham v. A. J. Aberman, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

CUNNINGHAM v. ABERMAN, INC.,358 F.2d 747(3rd Cir. 1966)

Theodore W. CUNNINGHAM, Individually and as a Partner of White and

Cunningham, a Partnership, Composed of W.J. White, Jr., and Theodore W.

Cunningham, Appellant, v. A.J. ABERMAN, INC.

No. 15471.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued January 20, 1966.

Decided March 15, 1966.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Herbert P. Sorg, Judge.

Paul Ginsburg, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

David R. Levin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On review of the record and consideration of the supplemental briefs filed by the parties, the Order of the District Court dated March 25, 1965 will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Sorg in his Opinion,252 F. Supp. 602, filed that date.