Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary

358 F.2d 304

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1966-06-13
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: This appeal was withdrawn from submission pending action of the Supreme Court on a petition for a writ of Certiorari, filed in Draper v. Washington, No. 107, Misc., October Term, 1965. The petition therein has now been denied. 382 U.S. 961, 86 S.Ct. 442, 15 L.Ed.2d 364. This appeal is accordingly again taken under submission. Robert Draper, incarcerated in Washington State Penitentiary pursuant to a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the courts of that state, herein appeals from a district court order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
4 opinions
DRAPER v. RHAY,358 F.2d 304(9th Cir. 1966)
Robert DRAPER, Appellant, v. B.J. RHAY, Superintendent, Washington State
Penitentiary, Appellee.
No. 19364.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 4, 1966.
Certiorari Denied June 13, 1966.
See 86 S.Ct. 1901.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Southern Division; Charles L. Powell, Judge.
Robert Draper, in pro. per.

John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen., of Washington, Olympia, Wash., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY, MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal was withdrawn from submission pending action of the Supreme Court on a petition for a writ of Certiorari, filed in Draper v. Washington, No. 107, Misc., October Term, 1965. The petition therein has now been denied.382 U.S. 961, 86 S.Ct. 442, 15 L.Ed.2d 364. This appeal is accordingly again taken under submission.

Robert Draper, incarcerated in Washington State Penitentiary pursuant to a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the courts of that state, herein appeals from a district court order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The order is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, reported at242 F. Supp. 829.Page 305