Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

United States v. Sydney Klein, D/B/A Standard Real Estate Company, Eugene Spirer and R. Doyne Halbritter. Sydney Klein

356 F.2d 983

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1966-03-15
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dated April 2, 1964, as amended by the Stipulation of the parties approved this date, will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Rosenberg in his opinion reported at 230 F.Supp. 426 (W.D.Pa.1964).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Sydney Klein, D/B/A Standard Real Estate Company, Eugene Spirer and R. Doyne Halbritter. Sydney Klein. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
9 opinions
UNITED STATES v. KLEIN,356 F.2d 983(3rd Cir. 1966)
UNITED STATES of America v. Sydney KLEIN, d/b/a Standard Real Estate
Company, Eugene Spirer and R. Doyne Halbritter. Sydney Klein, Appellant.
No. 15108.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued January 17, 1966.
Decided March 15, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Louis Rosenberg, Judge.
Leonard Boreman, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Baskin, Boreman, Sachs Craig, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.Page 984

Samuel J. Reich, First Asst. U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa. (Gustave Diamond, U.S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dated April 2, 1964, as amended by the Stipulation of the parties approved this date, will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Rosenberg in his opinion reported at230 F. Supp. 426(W.D.Pa. 1964).