Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States ex rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill Prison

355 F.2d 208

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1966-02-01
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

both focusing on danger of distortion in deciding testimonial waiver issue

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States ex rel. Laino v. Warden of Wallkill Prison. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

U.S. LAINO v. WARDEN OF WALLKILL PRISON,355 F.2d 208(2nd Cir. 1966)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Frank LAINO, Relator-Appellant, v. WARDEN

OF WALLKILL PRISON, ULSTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 223, Docket 30096.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued January 11, 1966.

Decided February 1, 1966.

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles H. Tenney, Judge, dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Stephen D. Finale, New York City, for relator-appellant.

Robert E. Fischer, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Binghamton, N Y (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of State of New York, New York City, on the brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before MEDINA, MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on Judge Tenney's opinion below, reported at246 F. Supp. 72(1965).Page 209