Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

James W. Kindelan and Mary Kindelan v. United States

James W. Kindelan & Mary Kindelan v. United States, 351 F.2d 310 (5th Cir. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-11-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: The district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which are the basis for its judgment from which this appeal was taken. Kindelan v. United States, S.D.Fla.1964, 233 F.Supp. 557. We find ourselves in agreement with the conclusions reached by the district court. See United States v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James W. Kindelan and Mary Kindelan v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
KINDELAN v. UNITED STATES,351 F.2d 310(5th Cir. 1965)
James W. KINDELAN and Mary Kindelan, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of
America, Appellee.
No. 21909.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 18, 1965.
Rehearing Denied November 4, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, David W. Dyer, Judge.
Thomas H. Anderson and Anderson Nadeau, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Robert N. Anderson, Edward I. Heilbronner, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Lavinia L. Redd, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel, for appellee.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The district court made findings of fact and conclusions of law which are the basis for its judgment from which this appeal was taken. Kindelan v. United States, S.D.Fla. 1964,233 F. Supp. 557. We find ourselves in agreement with the conclusions reached by the district court. See United States v. Howe, 9th Cir. 1965,349 F.2d 483. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.Page 311