Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Alfred Taylor v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
346 F.2d 157
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-05-24
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM. As is true in Reyes v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 345 F.2d 722, decided by us this date, this appeal challenges the constitutional fairness of the Texas procedure oj allowing the indictment allegations oi prior felony convictions to be read to the jury in a Habitual Offender prosecution. The District Court’s decision must likewise be affirmed on the basis of Breen v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 341 F.2d 96.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alfred Taylor v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 5 opinions
TAYLOR v. BETO,346 F.2d 157(5th Cir. 1965)
Alfred TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas
Department of Corrections, Appellee.
No. 21735.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 24, 1965.
Sam R. Wilson, Houston, Tex., Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen. of Texas, Waggoner Carr, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Stanton Stone, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Howard M. Fender, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for appellee.
Before BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY,fn*District Judge.
Affirmed.
- Of the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. ↩