Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Pugliano v. Staziak

345 F.2d 797

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-06-10
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We can perceive no error in the disposition of this ease. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed, D.C., 231 F.Supp. 347.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pugliano v. Staziak. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

PUGLIANO v. STAZIAK,345 F.2d 797(3rd Cir. 1965)

Pietro Mario PUGLIANO, Appellant, v. Paul STAZIAK, Peter Pollice, Leonard

Monti, Enoc N. Johnson, Thomas Welsh, Vincent Tambura, Rita Henderson and

Marion Sarnic.

No. 15029.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted May 21, 1965.

Decided June 10, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Rabe Ferguson Marsh, Jr., Judge.

Pietro Mario Pugliano, pro se.

David W. Craig, City Sol., City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Robert E. Dauer, Asst. City Sol., City of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellees Staziak, Pollice, Monti and Johnson.

Richard C. Witt, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Welsh.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We can perceive no error in the disposition of this case. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed, D.C.,231 F. Supp. 347.Page 798