Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Mainelli v. Haberstroh

Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir. 1965)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-05-20
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C., 237 F.Supp. 190.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mainelli v. Haberstroh. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

MAINELLI v. HABERSTROH,344 F.2d 965(3rd Cir. 1965)

Mamie J. MAINELLI and Nicholas Mainelli v. Alfred HABERSTROH and Marie

Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant

Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli, Appellant.

No. 15157.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 20, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J., Nealon, Jr., Judge.

Milford J. Meyer, Meyer, Lasch, Hankin Poul, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis A. Fine, Honesdale, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hugh J. McMenamin, Warren, Hill, Henkelman McMenamin, Scranton, Pa. (Harvey Gelb, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C.,237 F. Supp. 190.Page 966