Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Yorke v. Harry's Department Store, Inc.

Yorke v. Harry's Dep’t Store, Inc., 343 F.2d 814 (5th Cir. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-04-05
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The district court determined that there was no genuine issue of any mate-ria] fact, and that the undisputed facts required a judgment for the appellees. We are in agreement with the district court’s decision and its judgment is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Yorke v. Harry's Department Store, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
YORKE v. HARRY'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC.,343 F.2d 814(5th Cir. 1965)
Nathan YORKE, As Trustee in Bankruptcy for Spaulding Industries, Inc.,
Appellant, v. HARRY'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 21242.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 5, 1965.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 1965.
Herbert P. Feibelman, Jr., Mobile, Ala., Jacob I. Grossman, and Alfred B. Teton, Chicago, Ill., Holbert, Tully Hodnette, Mobile, Ala., Froelich, Grossman, Teton Tabin, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellant.Page 815

Oliver J. Latour, Jr., Mobile, Ala., Hamilton, Denniston, Butler Riddick, Mobile, Ala., of counsel, for appellees.
Before WOODBURY,fn*JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The district court determined that there was no genuine issue of any material fact, and that the undisputed facts required a judgment for the appellees. We are in agreement with the district court's decision and its judgment is

Affirmed.Page 831
  1. Senior Judge of the First Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩