Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.

Mont. E. Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co., 342 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1965)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1965-03-15
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion. Montana Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Shell Oil Company et al., 216 F.Supp. 214 (D.Mont.1963).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Montana Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Shell Oil Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MONTANA EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. v. SHELL OIL CO.,342 F.2d 430(9th Cir. 1965)

MONTANA EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY,

Fidelity Gas Company and Montana-Dakota Utilities Company, Appellees.

No. 19327.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 15, 1965.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Billings Division; William J. Jameson, Judge.

E.K. Cheadle, Billings, Mont., for appellant.

John D. Lawyer, Denver, Colo., Armin M. Johnson, Minneapolis, Minn., Raymond Hildebrand, Glendive, Mont., for appellees.

Before ORR, HAMLEY and BROWNING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion. Montana Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Shell Oil Company et al.,216 F. Supp. 214(D.Mont. 1963).Page 431