Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Horace Roy Richardson v. United States

342 F.2d 417

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-03-12
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We follow the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits in United States v. Decker, 292 F.2d 89, cert. den. 368 U.S. 834, 82 S. Ct. 58, 7 L.Ed.2d 36; Frye v. United States, 315 F.2d 491 and Starks v. United States, 316 F.2d 45, holding Section 5821 of Title 26 U.S.C.A. constitutional.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Horace Roy Richardson v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES,342 F.2d 417(5th Cir. 1965)
Horace Roy RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 21861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 1965.
Horace Roy Richardson, Leavenworth, Kan., for appellant.Page 418

Jamie Boyd, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ernest Morgan, U.S. Atty., Fred J. Morton, Asst. U.S. Atty., El Paso, Tex., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and FRIENDLY,fn*Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We follow the decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits in United States v. Decker,292 F.2d 89, cert. den.368 U.S. 834,82 S. Ct. 58,7 L.Ed.2d 36; Frye v. United States,315 F.2d 491and Starks v. United States,316 F.2d 45, holding Section 5821 of Title 26 U.S.C.A. constitutional.

The judgment is affirmed.
  1. Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩