Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.

Mohasco Indus., Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. & Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., 340 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1965)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1965-01-22
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Mohasco Industries, Inc., the plaintiff below, complains of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in favor of appellees (defendants) in an action for patent infringement. The trial court held that the patents in issue were invalid and void and not infringed by the defendants. We are in agreement with the result reached by the trial court. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
MOHASCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. BARWICK MILLS,340 F.2d 319(5th Cir. 1965)
MOHASCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. E.T. BARWICK MILLS, INC. and
Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., Appellees.
No. 20966.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 22, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Lewis R. Morgan, Judge.
Leslie B. Young, New York City, Albert E. Mayer, Atlanta, Ga., Stanton T. Lawrence, Jr., New York City, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor Adams, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Charles H. Walker, New York City, M. Cook Barwick, Wilson, Branch, Barwick and Vandiver, Atlanta, Ga., Albert E. Fey, Fish, Richardson Neave, New York City, of counsel, for appellees.
Before WISDOM, and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Mohasco Industries, Inc., the plaintiff below, complains of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in favor of appellees (defendants) in an action for patent infringement. The trial court held that the patents in issue were invalid and void and not infringed by the defendants. We are in agreement with the result reached by the trial court. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E.T. Barwick Mills, Inc.,221 F. Supp. 191(1963). The judgment is affirmed.Page 320