Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Mahoney v. United States

Mahoney v. United States, 339 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1964)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-12-17
Topic: general

ORDER These appeals came on to be heard and v?ere submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records. The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not eleai’ly erroneous. The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in 220 F.Supp. 823,.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mahoney v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES,339 F.2d 605(6th Cir. 1964)

H.T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America,

Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant

v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 15819, 15820.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 17, 1964.

H. Calvin Walter, Knoxville, Tenn., Walter, Gilbertson Claiborne, Knoxville, Tenn., of counsel, for appellants.

J.F. Bishop, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John H. Reddy, U.S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

These appeals came on to be heard and were submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records.

The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in220 F. Supp. 823.Page 696