Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

United States of America Ex Rel. Barney P. Bennett v. The City of Chicago, Etc.

United States Ex Rel. Barney P. Bennett v. City of Chi., Etc., 336 F.2d 197 (7th Cir. 1964)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-05-27
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. The motion of respondent-appellee to affirm the judgment is granted. Upon consideration of the pleadings and papers filed in the district court and in this court, the judgment of the district court that the cause be dismissed because the petition fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States of America Ex Rel. Barney P. Bennett v. The City of Chicago, Etc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF CHICAGO,336 F.2d 197(7th Cir. 1964)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Barney P. BENNETT, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. The CITY OF CHICAGO, etc., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 14518.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

May 27, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.Page 198

Barney P. Bennett, pro se.

William G. Clark, Atty. Gen., John C. Melaniphy, Corporation Counsel, Harry H. Pollack, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of respondent-appellee to affirm the judgment is granted. Upon consideration of the pleadings and papers filed in the district court and in this court, the judgment of the district court that the cause be dismissed because the petition fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted is affirmed.Page 199Page 203