Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America

Nedd v. United Mine Workers of Am., 332 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1964)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-05-29
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dismissing the plaintiffs’ action will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Grim in his opinion, 225 F.Supp. 750 (E.D.Pa.1963).

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
NEDD v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA,332 F.2d 373(3rd Cir. 1964)
Charles NEDD, Albert Kocher and Anthony Ganly, Members of the Pensioned
Anthracite Coal Miners Protest Executive Committee, suing on behalf of
themselves and all other members of the Class of Pensioned Anthracite Coal
Miners and Widows of Deceased Pensioned Anthracite Coal Miners, Appellants
v. UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, an unincorporated trade union
association.
No. 14773.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued May 21, 1964.
Decided May 29, 1964.
Rehearing Denied June 22, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Allan K. Grim, District Judge.
James S. Palermo, Hazleton (William Bruno, Philadelphia, Pa., on the briefs), for appellants.

Charles A. Wolfe and Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (Montgomery, McCracken, Walker Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., Welly K. Hopkins, Washington, D.C., of counsel, on the briefs), for appellee.
Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court dismissing the plaintiffs' action will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Grim in his opinion,225 F. Supp. 750(E.D.Pa. 1963).