Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of America

Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of Am., 330 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1964)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-05-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals from a nonappealable order, namely, a dismissal of one defendant, the United States of America, in an action for slander (mislabeled an action for libel) upon the grounds the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, it is clear that the plaintiff has sued in the wrong forum. Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of America. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
PERRY v. BAMMAR,330 F.2d 240(9th Cir. 1964)
Julius Dwaine PERRY, Sr., Appellant, v. George BAMMAR, Officer, Raymond W.
May, Warden, The United States of America, Appellees.
No. 19028.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
April 2, 1964.
Certiorari Denied May 4, 1964.
See 84 S.Ct. 1223.
Page 241
Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr., in pro. per.

Francis C. Whelan, U.S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section; and James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES, MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from a nonappealable order, namely, a dismissal of one defendant, the United States of America, in an action for slander (mislabeled an action for libel) upon the grounds the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction.

Additionally, it is clear that the plaintiff has sued in the wrong forum.

Affirmed.