Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

James R. Freeling v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

326 F.2d 971

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-09-30
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by this court that the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the Trial Court’s opinion, D.C., 221 F.Supp. 955.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed James R. Freeling v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 21 opinions

FREELING v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP.,326 F.2d 971(10th Cir. 1963)

James R. FREELING, Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee.

No. 7314.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 30, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma.

Delmer L. Stagner, Sam W. Moore, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant.

John H. Cantrell, Oklahoma City, Okla., John F. Lord, Gen. Counsel, Leslie H. Fisher, Asst. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered by this court that the judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed for the reasons stated in the Trial Court's opinion, D.C.,221 F. Supp. 955.Page 972Page 47