Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

John B. Taggart v. Vermont Transportation Co., Inc. And Albert Legg

325 F.2d 1022

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1964-01-17
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We have carefully considered the arguments of the parties and have examined the record. We have concluded that we can add nothing of consequence to the cogent opinion of Judge Freedman handed down in the court below, D.C., 32 F.R.D. 587. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed John B. Taggart v. Vermont Transportation Co., Inc. And Albert Legg. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

TAGGART v. VERMONT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,325 F.2d 1022(3rd Cir. 1964)

John B. TAGGART v. VERMONT TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc. and Albert Legg,

Appellants.

No. 14497.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued December 12, 1963.

Decided January 17, 1964.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Abraham L. Freedman, Judge.

Thomas E. Comber, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (James Paul Dornberger, Pepper, Hamilton Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief) for appellants.

James E. Beasley, Philadelphia, Pa., (Beasley Ornsteen, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the arguments of the parties and have examined the record. We have concluded that we can add nothing of consequence to the cogent opinion of Judge Freedman handed down in the court below, D.C., 32 F.R.D. 587. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.Page 3