Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. George Thomas Paige, Durwood Ray Burgess, and James Arthur Starke

324 F.2d 31

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1963-10-17
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. Convicted, with others, of the unlawful removal, concealment and possession of 110 gallons of distilled spirits in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205(a) (2), 5601 (a) (12), and 5604(a) (1), Durwood Ray Burgess appeals on the ground that the evidence did not establish his guilt. We think his motion for a judgment of acquittal should have been granted. A recital of the evidence will disclose that Burgess, while present, was not proved to be a participant in the commission of the offense for which he was tried. Treasury Department agents maintained a watch upon the home of George Thomas Paige, a co-defendant, in Newport News, Virginia on the night of June 1, 1962.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. George Thomas Paige, Durwood Ray Burgess, and James Arthur Starke. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
13 opinions