Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States

J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, & Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States, 320 F.2d 911 (5th Cir. 1963)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-10-10
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. We have carefully read the opinion of the District Court, 208 F.Supp. 594 (Southern District of Texas). This opinion, written by Judge Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., of this Court, sitting as a District Judge, carefully poses the issues and treats fully and carefully with the legal principles involved. Concluding, as we do, that the result arrived at by the District Court is correct and that the reasons assigned for reaching its conclusion persuade us of its correctness, we affirm the judgment on the opinion of the trial court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed J. C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

HURWITZ v. UNITED STATES,320 F.2d 911(5th Cir. 1963)

J.C. HURWITZ, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg, and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg,

Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 20309.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 20, 1963.

Rehearing Denied October 10, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., Judge.

Edmund L. Cogburn, Bernard O. Dow, Houston, Tex., Dow Dow, Harry Dow, Houston, Tex., for appellants J.C. Hurwitz, Julian Hurwitz, John Goldberg and Lillian Hurwitz Goldberg.

Michael Mulroney, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Meyer Rothwacks, Loring W. Post, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Woodrow B. Seals, U.S. Atty., John H. Baumgarten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and RIVES and MOORE,^fn*Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully read the opinion of the District Court,208 F. Supp. 594(Southern District of Texas). This opinion, written by Judge Joseph C. Hutcheson, Jr., of this Court, sitting as a District Judge, carefully poses the issues and treats fully and carefully with the legal principles involved. Concluding, as we do, that the result arrived at by the District Court is correct and that the reasons assigned for reaching its conclusion persuade us of its correctness, we affirm the judgment on the opinion of the trial court. Any further or more elaborate exposition of our views would be unnecessary.

The judgment is affirmed.Page 929

Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. ↩