Opinion · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS, 319 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1963)

Nat’l LABOR RELATIONS Bd. v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS BUTCHERWORKMEN OF N. Am., etc., 319 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1963)

Type: Opinion
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-06-24
Topic: general

N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS, 319 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1963) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS BUTCHERWORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, etc. No. 17302.United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. June 24, 1963.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS, 319 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1963). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

N.L.R.B. v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS,319 F.2d 132(8th Cir. 1963)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AMALGAMATED MEATCUTTERS BUTCHER

WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, etc.

No. 17302.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

June 24, 1963.

Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, for petitioner.

Robert L. Kimbrough, Topeka, Kan., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for enforcement is dismissed without prejudice and certified record ordered returned to the petitioner, on motion to withdraw petition for enforcement.Page 133