Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Mrs. Marie H. Chandler v. The Board of Public Education for the City of Savannah, Georgia and the County of Chatham

Mrs. Marie H. Chandler v. Bd. of Pub. Educ. for the City of Savannah, Ga. & the County of Chatham, 313 F.2d 636 (5th Cir. 1963)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1963-04-18
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The district court entered an order of dismissal in a cause where the appellants sought to assert a claim that the acts,, present and threatened, of the appellees-were depriving them of property without due process of law. The appellants’ complaint demonstrates that they are not being deprived of any federally protected right, and it seems clear that they have no standing to seek the remedy which is-the object of the suit. The district court properly dismissed the cause. Its judgment is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mrs. Marie H. Chandler v. The Board of Public Education for the City of Savannah, Georgia and the County of Chatham. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CHANDLER v. BD. OF PUB. EDUC., GEORGIA,313 F.2d 636(5th Cir. 1963)
Mrs. Marie H. CHANDLER et al., Appellants, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC
EDUCATION FOR the CITY OF SAVANNAH, GEORGIA and the County of Chatham, et
al., Appellees.
No. 20076.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 6, 1963.
Rehearing Denied April 18, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia; Frank M. Scarlett, Judge.
Aaron Kravitch, Savannah, Ga., for appellants.

R. Basil Morris, Savannah, Ga., Eugene Cook, Atty. Gen. of Georgia, Donald E. Payton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The district court entered an order of dismissal in a cause where the appellants sought to assert a claim that the acts, present and threatened, of the appellees were depriving them of property without due process of law. The appellants' complaint demonstrates that they are not being deprived of any federally protected right, and it seems clear that they have no standing to seek the remedy which is the object of the suit. The district court properly dismissed the cause. Its judgment is

Affirmed.Page 636